Siri play i think im turning Japanese

I'm typing on my cell btw very hard

4AM_critter 🐉Today at 8:20 PM
Almost there. I am so proud of you. Pussy cooch

How much is PCP in America 🤔

He said that.

I mmediately though... is she there with him?

Why would he be proud.

What the hell is this context.

@AnthonyLaCosaNostra just cleaned a 1 tb sata drive that reads at 150mb/sec for use as a network media drive with a usb external enclosure hooked to my modem. Seems like it will be fine for media server usage

@exaudi632 pretty cheap

Oh... I am going to put a sock on teh doorhandle for them and leave.

more expensive in my area due to were i am

@Rustyer266 20🤔

I was trying to give you hell and joke around, but now I have to explain it.

So that means the joke failed horribly.

@Misomania hmmm

any1 else have a cum sock?

9/11 jokes are funny

they r

i am not sure on the exact amount i just know the people in my group that did it said it was fairly cheap

i mostly did lsd

<:poi:484276893160308746>

drugs r bad

based on tim's definition, i am a free speech absolutist.

u believe u can yell fire in a crowded area?

yes,

try it

well, ignoring that you actually can

@AnthonyLaCosaNostra for $5 for the DVR and another 5 for the enclosure off ebay, seems like a decent deal to get a 1tb drive like this

that is should be legal

outside a few expections i think all speech should be allowed

Cool beans https://youtu.be/IWWwM2wwMww

pepe is racist

I think it might not be desirable, but I don't think it should be illegal.

like yelling some one has a gun in high school ect

catering to the stupidity of others, isn't really something I am for.

Du er jomfru @exaudi632

i think intent matters, people using speech to cause disruption like that on purpose should be punished

i disagree with that strongly

I give up trying to make people laugh.

And I shall resign to playing a video game.

Everyone have a great day.

<:poi:484276893160308746>

Why do you disagree? @Paradox

because half the point of speech is to disrupt.

causing people to panic cause they think there is a fire causing harm through trampling or who knows what should be illegal

It is illegal.

i kno

@Coochie coo nej det er jeg ikke

papadox thinks it it should be legal

😂

blaming the actions of others on your actions, isn't something I tend to go along with either.

if you are going to panic over a fire, you should see a fire first, or you are a moron

the intent of yelling fire in a crowded space is to cause harm

is it?

which is why it is illegal

always?

yes

How about Yelling "You're Fired!"?

even when there is a fire?

Americas drug traffic is very nice

fine, ill play that game and rephrase

if there is an actual fire, that is not under "the intent to cause harm"

the intent of yelling fire in a crowded space, when there is no fire, is to cause harm

well, what if there is some other reason other than intending harm?

can u think of one

idk, maybe u got a song stuck in yoru head

maybe you got tourrett's

lmfao

i think I've made my point clear now

that is so ridiculous I will not entertain that

y is that ridiculous?

what's ridiculous is assuming intent

løgner @exaudi632 jesus elsker

Ah, yes, I had a song stuck in my head mr. judge, that is why I yelled fire. Please don't punish me.

heck, maybe you didn't know and your friends dared you to, there's a ton of reasons

I think we took the conversation to it's conclusion

sure, you think that actions in themselves have an assigned intent. I think differently.

Paradox, I can believe it isn't intentional to cause harm if it's a six year old. but an adult is a different story

I'm sure you have already, but have you talked to any VW bus clubs? I use to own a 1967 vw bus and they are very customizable, just a thought @Timcast

even then, why are people solely believing a 6 yo is beyond me

I don't think that actions have defined intent, but they do have defined consequences

if you yell fire in a crowd, someone will panic

not convinced all people are that stupid

Not sure if VW buses are a big deal on the eastcoast howver

No, but I think there is reasonable evidence to assume intent, in this case. That is how our courts work though. It isn't perfect.

in which case?

The case of yelling fire in a crowded area.

i haven't assumed intent, i thought that's what we were discussing

and i was disagreeing

you haven't, hiniku is saying that there may be reasonable evidence in the case of yelling fire in a theatre

to convince a court of malicious intent

which is why i am a free speech absolutist, like i said at the beginning, according ot tim's definition.

I think there might be some miscommunication, when did I say you were agreeing?

oh was that an appeal to authority?

How about this Paradox

i was disagreeing with that.

Let's see if we can agree on this

too

If someone has malicious intent to hurt people and yells fire in a crowded theatre, should they be punished?

nope

what?

I think that if your actions cause physical harm to another person, whether your actions were physical or verbal, you deserve punishment. I'm a consequentialist

because yelling fire doesn't hurt people

Ok, well, that is stupid.

it's speech

the people being morons and panicing and trampling eachother is what hurts people, they should be punished for being too dumb

The action of yelling fire is causing the actions of panic which is causing harm...

and...them trampling eachother is that punishment

that's like saying dropping a crate on someone to kill them doesn't hurt people

it's the gravity

You guys see the vids of the transformer explosion in NYC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyLqkzKeJis&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR2ijPx5hB6CJRzfsdioe9wDeLTdmgvMX9se12ZgSb6XWP98wNXlRcgrgHA

https://twitter.com/tara_arianna/status/1078475450802978817?s=19

Officer, ***I*** didn't murder the lady, physics did. All i did was pull the trigger.
Blame newton for figuring out that for every reaction there is an equal and oppsite raction.

your assumption is that people MUST panic when someone yells fire.

I disagree.

not most

some

if someone yells fire, the implication is that there is a direct threat to human life, because there is a fire

yes, and some people eat their own poop, i don't think laws should be designed around the exceptions

this causes a fight/flight response

People do panic if someone yells fire

that's not an exception

Ok, so what if a person purposefully intends to cause a panic to hurt people, they do it by yelling fire in a crowded threatre, should they be punished?

i already said no

My god

Well, I got even more specific

hiniku that's a bad argument, because categorically that's a slippery slope towards "what if someone wants to harm people so they hurt someone's feelings"

if someone intends to kill me by talking me to death, i also don't think they should be arrested on attempted murder charges.

hurting someone's feelings isn't the same as intending to kill / harm them

is that a powerplat malfunctioning?

on a physical level

Wait what? @GoldenPhoenix

Can I get an example

I hear Tim likes One Punch Man

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTLlbYc_sWg

i didn't say hurt my feelings.

i said talk me to death

Talk me to death makes no sense, causing panic to hurt does.

It's exploding

right, talking someone to death doesn't make sense, that's the point

She did way more physical harm to him, than he did to her

lol

That's more of a dive than professional soccer players

yelling doesn't hurt anyone

And that's saying something

@Hiniku intending to do harm by speech is a bad argument because that can be extrapolated into a rediculous curtailment of freedom of speech. your situation is good, but you're arguing the wrong point. It's not that they yelled fire (the speech), it's that they directly caused physical harm to a person

look

well, maybe their eardrums or something, which i would take issue with

Whoops, wrong channel.

people panicing is their own action

But my point is that you are making a false equivalence between talk to death and causing panic in a crowded space @Paradox

which they are responsible for

What caused them to panic

people don't panic without a stimulus, whether real or imagined

their stupidity

Good idea @GoldenPhoenix

yes, imagined. IE delusional/irrational.

that's not a way to run a legal system, otherwise every case of someone being taken advantage of can be chalked up to their personal stupidity

If you yelled fire, you are the direct harm of the people who panic, because you started the panic. @Paradox

No. They panic'd of their own accord in response to me shouting a word.

If someone kills themself because I write a sad song, am i responsible?

no, they had the choice to listen to it

So is it the bullets fault that some dies of a gun wound or is it the person who shot the gun?

Metaphorically, the people running in panic are the bullets of the one that yelled fire.

it's more complicated than that, but...

Either one understands context, or one doesn't.
https://giphy.com/gifs/week-media-person-RL0xU1daTlMoE

That's not a good straw man, hiniku.

You are also diminishing the urgency/importance of yelling fire in a theater falsely

If the person yelling fire actually trampled them, then he is actually causing violence

It's just a metaphor

otherwise, he's just yelling

sure it might be disruptive, someone being loud while u r trying to watch a movie, but it shouldn't be illegal.

It is a reasonable response to leave a crowded area if someone yelled fire, you act like this is an unnatural response.

Technically yes, but the person thst caused the panic should also be at fault since they are the one who caused the panic

you're talking about it sitting at a desk or on your phone in abstract. being "logical" about a high stress situation doesn't give proper representation of the event

panicing would be unreasonable, you could leave without panicing, you could...look around...

If someone is using that response, on purpose, to cause harm, it should be illegal

Anyone here plays dragonrealms?

So, people using the stupidity of others against them to cause harm should be illegal?

Humans panic

Yes

Like humans rape

*Nods.*

Also not stupidity

Like humans murder

When intended**#**#** Which you assume is always the intent.

Has no idea what we are talking about, if it is bagging on humans, I'm in.

No

Lolol

Trampling on human?

Intent was proven, for our make believe we can pretend their was evidence, like a note.

Lol

Pick yer kink

So, wait, now you agree?

Can i have all of them?

Bondage... ropes.

Oh....so you want to prove intent first?

All the kinks?

Sure why not

Nice

Poop

Food fetish

Feet

No need, for my make believe I said that the actor intended to do harm.

....

Clowns

Balloon popping

I disagree.

"If someone has malicious intent to hurt people and yells fire in a crowded theatre, should they be punished?"

there's not enough fake breasts rupturing mid-coitus porn on the internet

Ok, this is going no where

there are only 3 intents for yelling fire in a theatre: 1. there's a fire, 2. malicious intent, 3. stupidity of some sort. you've already shown you think someone's stupidity can be a punishable offense, the first shouldn't be illegal, the second should, the third should be anyway, like manslaughter vs murder. a person is dead regardless of intent

We have come to our conclusion

I don't really want those kinks... I will stick with bondage and swings.

I believe certain actions cause harm, speaking even at a loud volume, isn't really one of them (other than like i said before, if it's too loud).

@Dusty Morgan ... swings?

....but balloon popping is my primary kink

@Copernicus you never used a swing before? super sexy

Straight I believe

Oh nvm

bondage is pretty fun <:lurk:478001049756499968>

That swing

Balloon popping king... stick it in the butt and pop it.

XD

Ooof

That would probably result in a trip to the hospital

I have a phobia of balloons

oof you forgot the breeding fetish 😂

^^

What the fuck is breeding fetish.... have as many children you can and cripple yourself with child support?

(breeding isn't a fetish but ok

)

I like feet and teeth 😄

there is a fetish for catching hiv

<:MeguPuke:463959936393543700>

Mixed together?

Scrapping teeth agianst skin or being bitten?

kick me in the teeth daddy uwu

I'll bite feet

a breeding kink is the sexual attraction of impregnating your partner or getting impregnated. that's literally the point of sex, so it's not a fetish

....

I don't know how I feel about that.

What about the sexualization of prego women

Have you ever had your toes sucked on 😳