general
Discord ID: 463054787336732683
845,392 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 1510/3382
| Next
he wont be able to because Im in menendez's state
but he will talk generally about dems
I got that much. So I guess it's mostly going to be you objecting and him trying to overcome those objections?
yup
and he wont be able to
but im willing to listen and itll be a good discussion hopefully
but im expecting a lot of npc responses
thats good ๐
Aslong as theres a good Dialogue
it will help
there is no response to identitarianism
question
Well now theres only one thing we can do to prepare
"should you judge someone based on the color of their skin?"
Come up with a bingo for the interview
that we can all mark as it goes on
No.
<:NPC:500042527231967262>
economy is great so policy arguments dont work
Just need 24 npc responses
Yeah
if the economy is doing good its hard to argue policy and taxes when it works as intended
Stock market's been rough. He'll probably bring that up.
It looks like a correction from optimism and it's been mostly volatility.
yeah lol ppl love taking credit when it works and deflecting when its shaky
The fundamentals are very solid and unemployment is down.
lol like if its shaky now its long enough after obama that they wont feel bad still claiming he set up trump real good
unemployment is best it ever was from what i read
Im betting the following things come up in no particular order
Mean Tweets
Press being the Enemy of the People
Revision of title 9 to be "anti trans"
Insulting key allies
Separating children from parents
Withdrawal from Paris Accords
A lot of investors have been feeling the volatility though and a lot of other countries are having things go rough.
and that its cuz trump that its not going so good now
It's not as simple as only unemployment, but the situation is very strong for people getting jobs.
There's concern that wage growth is going to start driving inflation soon.
yeah even with a shaky market thats the best kidn of market for employees
Which...would help fix income inequality as inflation degrades wealth.
And if it's doing it via wage growth, that's very beneficial for employees.
yeah i mean it really depends
like the minimum wage here is gon go to 15ish in like half a year or a bit longer
but im gonna be getting a raise soon to about that
but because i dont work the full year ill still be in the lower tax bracket
and with the minimal expenses i have cuz ive already invested so much in my lil side gig as a musician its gonna work in my favour quite well
A Tax trap?
yikes
even once the minimum wage increases
"Amati testified that her mental health had declined after she began taking hormones to transition from male to female."
oof
I mean, taht can happen
Estrogen is a hell of a drug for your emotional range
I'm not sure that's necessarily a cause and effect though.
No one really understands how all this stuff works.
many "men" just aren't prepared to what estrogen can do with regards to emotional stability compared to how they were before
And it could be correlation.
I've met many mTf people who report the same thing
altho its gonna be meh cuz im also going to start training new employees once im back
where suddenly things get to them way easier
See being a womyn is hard, we're always on the brink of axe attacking
๐
and the first is gonna be cool cuz its my lil brother n we work well to gether and get along
well it's more like
they're dealing with a different emotional base?
and sometimes it's hard to get a grip on it
I guess>
but after the new ppl that are coming in are gonna be gettin the same pay as me and im gonna have to do half their jobs while i train and fix all the shti they fuck up
supervise for safety n shit too lol
Ouch.
Get ready
I'm having Virginia 2017 nightmares.
This really cuts both ways.
good thing my job is hella chill cuz the ppl i work with (including my boss) and my hours are hella flexible cuz my boss is a family friend and knows im a musician (i play at the staff parties) so as long as my scheduling is in orger i can get whenever i want off
But all indications tell me the blue wave is alive and well.
and theyll be good to cover me when im not there
(which is still rare in teh winter anyways)
BUT VOTE IF YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY. Predictions are predictions. Just vote already.
omfg Ptsd? What word abuse
dont you know
ppl died after trump was elected
directly because of trump
and still are deaded because of him
(im trolling now)
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
Cant wait to see a supercut of the dems crying and sad
Lol
Let me find some More proofs . . (stumbles and gives random links with no coherence nor relevance to each other ) I FOUND THe truuuuuuth
How in the world can an election give people PTSD?
It would be one thing if we elected a dictator into power or if the country was plunged into a civil war because of the election
"See being a womyn is hard, we're always on the brink of axe attacking"
is this where the term axe wound came from.... jk
10/10
axe as in deodorant ? ๐
i have a sneaking suspicion that Beto is going to win in Texas. i think the fix is in.
he's too important to the democrats to leave it up to voters.
๐ค
Waited 2 hours in line for early voting today
U vote R or what
Federal for sure
I think local politics is going to get a bit fucked up this year by straight ticket voters
ya
hi
Hello
@Timcast that article was terrifying.
How do they know how many young people vote?
Which article?
Axe tranny?
the woman who attacked two people with an axe
dear goodness
reeee
she had every intent to kill those people
What did le woman do
can you scroll up to the article?
Ya saw the video a while ago, very violent and gore
@ExceptionalFeather They look at the age
18-29 is the young vote
O.O
Generation Z and Millenials
How is it recorded though
Generation Z tend to be more to the right
wdym?
When they record ur vote they record ur age
name
etc
Do all the polling places record who shows up with the age though?
The media would have to gather the information, who keeps track of it and where does the media get it from
Pretty sure most of em do
Maybe rural towns don't
Because lack of people working at polling sites
Any working voting system should be able to tell who voted. It should not be able to tell how they voted (on an individual level) but you have to know who voted to guard against fraud. From there you just cross check with the registration records.
The state government should be able to tell based on their records.
So they keep a database then? Who rounds up all the data for a federal number?
Probably the media. There's enough people who want all that data that it's probably been done many times over already and will be done even more in the future.
You also could be seeing exit polls, which are just a journalist sitting outside the polling site asking people who they voted for.
And since that's public and in the open you can do statics to try and extrapolate from there.
But the state governments will have the actual early voting demographics already.
I wonder if the guess that young people are on the left is just polls on campuses
It'll be alot of things, polls on campuses, polls via phone, polls via social media, polls just standing on the street.
I have no doubt the general rule that it's 2-1 D-R is accurate.
The young have basically always leaned left. the notion that Generation Z might lean conservative is so unprecedented that it makes me (and alot of other people) skeptical that may have been the one time statistical fluke or something.
What is the percentage of economic migrants?
100%
Probably 80% to 90%. Legitimate asylum claims will be pretty low.
^
I think it was around 70-80 back at 4000 in the caravan
I'm told the real goal is to intercept them and process the claims in Mexico. It gives more legal flexibility that way.
look at all them womyn and children
Haven't seen any updates for the 12k number
It's probably similar.
That was intentional on the medias part Exceptional.
They shifted gears and focused on midterms.
Leaving the caravan information on the backburner.
I would imagine more of the new ones are economic migrants
I am so disappointed in islam with pictures like that.
wat
Reason they are in large numbers... either they think they can get away with economic migrant claim like what happen in Europe or that they can force their way through the border through use of violence.
They already shown they will use violence to achieve their goals.
The caravan is already breaking laws what makes you think they will follow american laws ? <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
Well how can you not see that and immediately be inspired to drive a Truck of Peace there to help out, and still call yourself a good Muslim?
I know they will not follow our laws Contro.
@JustTom truck of peace lel โ๏ธ
I am trying to gauge what they are planning on doing.
people in Canada are calling them refugees ๐
They just want to to to Canada
Lel
Most definitely not refugees.
They are just fleeing from bad jobs.
RIP syetenatheism
yeah
Not violence.
And a lot of people call em refugees
word manipulation
I did like how they turned down aid in Mexico though
Some are refugees but just a small handful in comparison to the large number
Really sells the desperation
Lmao
They dont want help from mexico
China is playing a dangerous game.
calling everyone coming in a 'refugee' is how we got migrant rape gangs in the EU. You don't want migrant rape gangs, do you?
You can see interviews where most of them say they are coming here for economic opportunity, which means they should get in line for all the other people in the world that want to do the same.
I rather take in legitimate asylum claims.
People who truly need help.
No line cutting
yes, it's been abused for so long now... who's actually telling the truth
Economic migrants? So come and be on welfare/get lots of help I'm assuming for the older ones
Compassion isn't unlimited ... either is money
Economic migration today is nothing like it was 20-30 years ago
When my dad came
People are too dependent on welfare now
My patience has run thin already.
I am tired of our kindness being abused.
economic migrant just means the typical person coming here for oppurtunities
They should wait in line like everyone else.
Which there is a long line for
Agreed Dusty
What's stopping 40,00-50,000 people from coming for economic migration?
40,000*
China opposed the U.S. warshipโs entry into the waters around the reefs, the Chinese Defense Ministry said in a statement Tuesday. Chinese officials confirmed it sent the Luoyang to drive the USS Decatur away and urged the U.S. to stop its โprovocativeโ actions.
just gonna get higher nd higher
Lmao... Provocative actions.
They sent a warship to chase off US vessel.
As far as the chinese vs US warships go heres the displacement for each ship
USS Decatur - Arleigh Burke Class Destroyer Displacement: Light: approx. 6,752 tons - Full: approx. 8,886 tons
Chinese Type 052D Destroyer - Full load 7500 tons
United States warships are battle tested. Chinese warships are not.
They sent a smaller warship to chase away a larger one because of the optics associated with the situation
Plus our navy outnumbers theirs by an crazy amount.
You know, if it was 1 ship vs. 1 ship, I think China might have the balls to try something, but ah... even if they won any kind of skirmish on that level, I don't think China wants what it would cause.
US cant fire on a smaller weaker ship without looking aggressive and it allows the chinese to do whatever they want, short of firing on the US
We would decimate their navy in matter of weeks to be honest.
If they tried.
Then their islands they made would fall.
Weeks. LOL
We have a system in place for how many people we can let in for immigration including asylum seekers, why should someone get to cut the line if they are on this side of the hemisphere
It's hard to say Dusty.
Look at our aircraft carriers.
Look at the number of fighter jets and bombers.
Look at the number of subs.
Local troop strength isn't as lopsided as people think. Particularly in local Chinese Waters.
Look at the number of ships.
Troops don't matter in the water.
The chinese navy is very dangerous inbetween their coast and the Philippines
Yes, but most of those boats and people are somewhere else.
Theyll have the edge in ships, planes, and missiles they can lob at the area
What are they going to do, stand on the shore and yell at us?
Actually you underestimating the Navy.
Lob missles. They do have very good anti-ship missiles.
Diplomacy probably always the best option when dealing with Chinese shenanigans
The number of planes, ships, and missiles we can lob at them easily.
It's not about troop strength over there in the overall. It's about the fact that if China actually pushed a naval engagement, we can ping every ship they have, launch fighters, and blow every last one of their ships up within 24 hours. All it would take is someone giving the order.
We have rapid deployment all around the world.
It takes time to mobilize and concentrate your forces dude. By the time the US gain local numerical superiority, the UN would have made an ultimatum/armistice by then.
No dusty, your patriotism is blinding you. The chinese have local force superority in a way the US cant hope to match.
Make no mistake, in total war with all assets, it's probably in the US's advantage.
But locally, in a short war. Or one in which the US is skittish.
Now, if it actually became a land war... that'll take a lot more time to deal with.
However, wars arent local anymore and in a global battle the US cant lose.
It's not exactly the US's edge.
I wouldn't say the Chinese win either. But it wouldn't be a blowout.
Nobody wins a global war on that scale though
99% of the US's military limitation is that we don't just go in and wreck up our enemies. It's because we're always playing the 'good guys', that we don't just bomb our enemy into the ground and be done with it.
Basically we hold back every time we engage in warfare.
Period.
ehhh
Don't get me wrong, that's a good thing, since it limits civilian casualties. But consider this: The last time the US didn't hold back, we had these two little bombs we dropped.
Ask Japan about it.
It also depends on how much President does without congress
I wouldnt say dumping Agent Orange on rando rice farmers was 'holding back'. The main point should be whether US ground troops are allowed to occupy significant land area of enemy territories.
And given how much our tech has improved since then, we could easily wipe out nearly any country on the planet without even going to nukes.
845,392 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 1510/3382
| Next