tradworker
Discord ID: 274535531927568384
157,502 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 285/1576
| Next
How do you reconcile following entirely jewish ideology of libertarianism with pro whiteness?
will we get recreational nukes?
I don't know if it's entirely Jewish as America started out pretty libertarian
They are in the stages of denial, full NS is enevitable in my mind.
Us Americans just have more of a sense of desire for freedom than perhaps you europeans
all roads lead to ethno nationalism ๐
Libertarian "fascists" are misguided souls who think NS is somehow against a free market. Hitler liked the market. But everyone had to serve the nation or they were crushed.
Think about libertarian thinkers, almost 99,99% jewish. Even HHH is married to a turkish woman.
I didn't say they weren't, just that the desire for freedom (which is pretty much libertarianism, the ideology is just more fleshed out) was around prior to Jews really getting here
eurozoners just dont wan tthe state to fuck with their persona 5 saves and mudslimes cutting in line and stelaing the last coronetto
People like Cantwell for instance, built their entire identity on lolbergtarianism. Once they get redpilled, they can't let it go and can't realize how Jewish capitalism is. It's cognitive dissonance.
It would be beneficial to the jews if the whites didn't organize but instead viewed all authority as evil like rebellious children.
Libertarianism is a fucking cancer. It allows degenerates freedoms that would be outlawed in an NS society.
Yeah, precisely what I mean Confessor. It's not how big a state, but how good a state.
Imagine believing there was a more noble vision and cleaner aesthetic ever to exist.
Instead of: Authority = Nazism & Communism, No authority = Muh freedumps & good
That seems like kind of a strawman. The thinkers themselves were anti-authority, yeah, but you can have freedom (liberty, to some degree libertarianism) such as the US did a couple hundred years ago without it being Jewish or anti-authoritarian
I guess what I'm getting at is muh gun rights, low taxes etc can coexist
NS had PLENTY of freedom. It had little freedumb.
We only need freedom to do good, the freedom to do evil is not desirable. National socialism makes whites free, unless you consider freedom to mainline meth and watch child porn essential to "being free".
Sweet Jesus just get in the TRS forums and you will see plenty of IE faggots who think they know what "good optics" are
No, I'm pretty much talking about the basic bitch talking points most whites in the US intrinsically feel
I don't care about drug or pornography restrictions
@Confessor Yeah, seems like a whole lot hasn't changed, you used to get banned for mentioning Donovan is a faggot.
The idea that freedom itself is valuable if not channeled towards a greater good is insane. Duty matters immensely more than freedom. You are not an island. You owe your very life to someone else. You exist in advanced civilization. You have a duty to steward that and it matters much more than muh atomized individualism above all.
The individual brain produced all great things. But it would mean NOTHING without the greater whole of civilization for it to exist in.
I agree
Not anymore fam. We've been getting people defending Grindr Gred, Ryan Faulk, and Jack ostrasized
Good.
The Alc-Right Rises and CJ's Throwing Homos in Woodchippers meme got the Death Panel to disavow Greg.
It used to be that calling out Donovan, Grindr Greg, O'Meara or any other open sodomite meant that you're ironlarperpurityspiraler who wants to divide and hurt the mobement.
We will need a night of the long knives to purge sodomites and nazbols eventually anyway.
Yea that shit got pushed out.
We're in the white baby business. Fags don't fit the utilitarian model. That's without going into the moral question.
Fascists and NS conversions are becoming commonplace in TRS
Because people want to be as effective as possible and as informed as possible. The more you know, the more you like Hitler.
Exactly @โฆColton of Yoreโฆ
It makes me feel stupid even saying this but it should go without saying three whites working in a group will always be more strong than one white alone. No matter how you look at it, libertarians will lose every time.
Liftwaffe needs to be everyone's number one goal atm. We need to look like chads, every one of us.
Libertarianism is a joke. A bad one. And it's almost stopped being worth a chuckle.
Jesus the Liftwaffe got David Duke feeling all high and mighty
Lol well it's deserved. Aesthetics and health matter so much. Our physical precense would strike fear into the hearts of our enemies and make their women guiltymoist.
I swear to the gods that he wouldn't stop talking about eating brocolli and fasting.
Lmao
Is that his secret?
Jesus Christ he would shut up about it
*wouldn't
Yeah, of course. What I was mainly meaning by libertarianism is muh gun rights and low taxes and shit like that, sorta libertarian positions but not necessarily everything with it
With a new money system taxes wouldn't even matter.
When everyone is military, guns are in surplus lol
You think Germans didn't have gun rights?
NS being anti-gun is another libertarian jew lie "Hitler grabbed everyone's guns like the LIBERALS to be able to holocaust them"
You think Hitler ever had his troops unload before mingling?
Gun ownership ROSE under Hitler.
And the Weimar gun control laws were relaxed.
I wasn't saying that, they're just traditionally libertarian positions in general
Not that NS disallowed guns etc
"University of Chicago law professor Bernard Harcourt explored this myth in depth in a 2004 article published in the Fordham Law Review. As it turns out, the Weimar Republic, the German government that immediately preceded Hitlerโs, actually had tougher gun laws than the Nazi regime. After its defeat in World War I, and agreeing to the harsh surrender terms laid out in the Treaty of Versailles, the German legislature in 1919 passed a law that effectively banned all private firearm possession, leading the government to confiscate guns already in circulation. In 1928, the Reichstag relaxed the regulation a bit, but put in place a strict registration regime that required citizens to acquire separate permits to own guns, sell them or carry them.
โThe 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition,โ Harcourt wrote. Meanwhile, many more categories of people, including Nazi party members, were exempted from gun ownership regulations altogether, while the legal age of purchase was lowered from 20 to 18, and permit lengths were extended from one year to three years."
http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4029&context=flr
NRA head Wayne LaPierre wrote: โIn Germany, Jewish extermination began with the Nazi Weapon Law of 1938, signed by Adolf Hitler.โ Dunno if he's a kike but sure sounds one.
Here we go, found mirror of the Libertarianism/Marxism article
Someone send that to Cantwell lol.
I can't recommend this enough to forever destroy the Kikertarians.
"The central underlying assumption of Marxism (and by extension, of all the SJW nonsense that is plaguing us today) is the notion that humans are fundamentally equal in their abilities (talent, potential, intelligence, etc). This is the logic behind the uplifting of Third World primitives to our level, the abolishing of gender roles, and all the other ills of the modern experience.
Libertarianism, on the other hand, is based on the notion that men are morally equal, which is to say that all men are selfish and self-interested. Thus giving any man power over others will lead to corruption, as he uses this power for selfish ends. But the ideology does recognize that there is a wide difference in abilities between men. From this dichotomy we get ideas like abolishing governments, or preventing state monopolies.
Marxism and Libertarianism, when presented this way, seem diametrically opposed; one believes in equality of ability but a moral hierarchy, while the other believes in moral equality but a hierarchy of ability. But both are still based on the liberal lie of equalityโthey just apply it differently. To the weak-minded emotional thinker, it is easier to accept the victim mentality that comes with Marxism, while to the rugged individualist itโs easier to accept the idea that everyone is selfish and that all authority is evil."
"The enemies of our people want us weak. With Marxism, they make us weak individually so that it matters not if we unite our forces. Through libertarianism, they insure that the strong among us stay isolated rather than uniting their powers and posing a threat.
We must abandon foolish notions of โobjectivityโ if those lead to our destruction. โFreedomโ is no different from โtoleranceโ. We all understand now that tolerance is not a virtue if the thing being tolerated is evil (bad for our people and against the natural order). Likewise, freedom to commit evil cannot be considered desirable. All that matters is freedom to do good. Today, we are not free to do good, because all laws are inverted by our enemies. Wishful thinkers long for freedom, thinking โwell, if we were totally free at least I could do the right thingโ. This is a compromise. Instead, we should long for total victory, where the only freedom is freedom to do good (meaning, what is good for our people). Our enemies certainly donโt cheer for the freedom to do what they donโt like, and neither should we."
He siezed kike guns. That is where they get that stupid meme.
Kikes had time and time again demonstrated they used their guns to support the communist revolutions so that should've made sense even from a libertarian perspective.
Well no, from a libertarian perspective it's wrong to judge groups (and thus take away their gun rights) because we're all radical individuals totally detached from eachother goy
***(((Jewish Bolshevism Intensifies)))***
Shouldn't freedom of association allow you to eject the kikes
Has B1488 ever made a post that didn't have echoes ๐ค
Oy vey but it's wrong to do things as a group or think a way about an entire group of people
I always use echoes. @Kombat-Unit
Though I may need to relax it a tad.
Of course, but what libracucc is going to defend NS kike gungrabbing
^ That is true.
"ERMAGERD! MUH NAP! MUH ROADS!"
Xonfessr
Move to MI
All that is left in the Libratarian movement are leftists anyway. Ron Paul's audience are made up of racist edgytarians and NS that have moved on from that halfassed ideology
No, I prefer my mostly white WV @Hand Banana
I gotta leave Las Vegas some time.
Jesus LV?
Yup. Lived there all of my life.
All 21 years of it thus far.
Everytime I leave West Virginia I get queesy just from seeing nonwhites everywhere
Then you would want to avoid Vegas like the plague then.
It literally is Coon & Mestizo City.
I want to avoid everywhere but my state like a plague.
4th whitest state. 94% White with a 97% White birthrate.
Damn.
I might have to see 1-2 blacks a month outside of a jobplace.
Jesus Christ ๐ฅ
Yea, its a shitty place to live jobwise, but there are no niggers whatsoever
well its obvious why no state gibs or public transport
Oh believe me there are plenty of gibs in wv
most of them go to druggos
My State is fucking browned ๐
was in my hometown yesterday and when down a street I had never gone down in my car and its a bunch of fucking va style apts turned into nog HQ had no fucking idea any of them were fucking there
157,502 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 285/1576
| Next