general-politics
Discord ID: 418667927169138688
42,736 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 10/171
| Next
Hitler was a pretty shitty leader
TBH nazism would be a bit more respected without him
Himmler is better in my opinion anyways
nazis give republicans a bad name, and hitler gives nazism a bad name.
And no, Hitler was not a bad leader.
damn right he was, he fought 2 fronts
although I'm sure he brought inspiration
Do you know WHY He declared war on the Soviets?
I donโt think you understand the scope of things.
He had to declare that war.
he didn't have to start the war in the first place
Actually he did.
to invade Poland? He should've just left it
Lmao
He shouldโve just allowed German lands to be taken away?
Allowed the Germans there to be abused by polish nationalists
Shouldnโt reconnect his nation?
So that itโs not split in two?
Lmao nice
Youโre literally saying he shouldnโt fight for Germany and the German people
Top kek
Well he did, and look where that got him
He got unlucky
It was beyond his control why he lost
By the way, you should thank him for invading the USSR.
t. guy who watched the greatest story never told and believed everything in it
I havenโt seen it actually. @deng
I keep wanting to.
But donโt have the time
Iโm reading Hunter by William Pierce atm
where were the germans being abused by polish nationalist
*nationalists
Danzig
I've seen Inglorious bastards
should watch that
Whatโs it about?
the danzig story is mostly propaganda
World War 2
where did you find evidence for it
its the full metal jacket of WW2
Oh cool
Iโl have to look again. @deng
It was a while ago when I researched it
Iโl get back to you though
@Donaldus Triumphus I donโt really have the time atm. Iโm reading 2 books atm
But eh, when I have time I will
its pro nazi
well
kind of
I donโt read something purely because itโs Pro-Nazi
inglorious bastards is about a bunch of jews beating up nazis
id reccomend it too
10/10
Lmao funny
it shows sympathy for the nazis so
guess its pro nazi
not really
And?
lmao
What value is that to me? ^^^
Lmao
hey just sayin
theres a scene where they beat a nazi to death with baseball bats
and its v iewed positively
Rood
check the comments, it aint
in the movie itself its supposed to be funny though
just because youtube nazis are mad
its a comedy?
it is
samuel l jackson is the narrator
Guess its a dark comedy
but that doesnt mean shit
Breaking Bad is a dark comedy
yeah but the nazis are not looked on favorably in inglorious bastards i remember watching it and its definitely something antifa would love to watch
still aint a comedy
American history X is a decent movie
Itโs anti Nazi but still pretty good
you know whats a good tv show
The Apprentice
A friend of mine and I actually watched it earlier
No lmao
Iโm gunna read for a bit then go to bed
Goodnight
damn socialists dont appreciate business
Hey, Iโm a National Socialist
***whats the difference***
One takes their....Nevermind in going to sleep lmao. Goodnight. @Donaldus Triumphus
=
imma go
add "it's the jews" and replace the merchant with porky the capitalist
Typical /leftypol/ trying to appropriate merchant memes for low energy porky memes
https://youtu.be/P843ju6YYI4 figured youโd like this @Donaldus Triumphus
When's the last time you've seen a white man pick strawberries or go gardening? Moreover, your understanding of wage labor value is over simplistic. Immigrant labor is often complementary and not substitute meaning that it wont necessarily lower wages of natives in an industry. Even so, I posted a study that presents evidence that thousands of cuban low skilled laborers had no significant impact on wage levels.The fact of the matter is that low skilled laborers are just that low skilled. They are much better off working in a country like ours with a better standard of living for those skills. The idea of it being a permanent underclass is overly reductionist. Immigrants tend to have high rates of income mobility, the next generations are better off than the next for them. I do agree that capitalism creates issues and that immigrant labor is exploited to maintain their bourgeoisie lifestyle. however, they are much better off in our society than being exploited by the likes of central American governments.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/322437764597678080/322452049390206977/Libido_Dominandi_-_Sexual_Liberation__Political_Control_-_E._Michael_Jones_2000.pdf
**Sexual Liberation | Political Control**
Read this
what is it about
How sexual liberation is a form of control and brainwashing
Sexual liberation as in sexual degeneracy
ill take a look
Mainly looks at Pornography
I'm against pornography and many leftists are too
And while all of that may be well and good in America as it is today with a heavy emphasis on native born Americans getting a college degree and pursuing more lucrative careers, I do not see that as a sustainable or even preferable path unless we manage to get to the point where automation is so ubiquitous in every single industry that the concept of labor is radically redefined. However if we were to return, by choice or by circumstance, to an economy where fewer and fewer people go to college and pursue higher income professions then there will be a problem of what is traditionally considered complementary immigrant work will be a substitution instead.
Furthermore I did not mean to imply that the children or grandchildren of immigrant laborers could not achieve social mobility. Rather I meant an underclass of imported darkies being refreshed by subsequent waves of immigration.
not all pornography of course but much of it is abusive and warps the minds expectations
But that was a miscommunication on my part due to my choice of words
Also lol at us getting the unique roles now. Shame the black kid had to vent his distaste for whites by calling it โcrackerโ though
well of course, more people generally means more competition but that's just one level of analysis. Either way the only jobs left in a capitalist economy will be managerial and jobs focusing on maintaining capital in this case there will be huge populations alienated and stuff
another thing is that our world is becoming increasingly connected and our economies are turning more open and not just because of NAFTA and other international common market deals. with more communication and more trade between nations the less economic borders exist you will be effectively competing with pajeet from India the more this continues without him living next door
*Another*?!
If anything thatโs a reason to reduce competition from immigrants at home. Unless of course youโd then argue that that would result in higher wages and therefore higher prices making the nation less competitive in export markets but even following that line of logic then the entire world would be racing toward the bottom trying to recruit sweatshop workers into their own borders or eliminating most jobs altogether with automation, at which point the conversation shifts to a different topic.
Another
I think our current rate of immigration is justifiable and sustainable, but I'm not for a global capitalist world either. I don't think capitalism will really be able to survive once automation is in motion because who's going to consume goods if they can't work.
Capitalism should die anyways
again I really only support highly regulated markets as a means to an end because command economies would be in probably most cases slower at devleoping the necessary means of production and wealth that would result in automation
Same here
Wait no
I support them regardless
i thought you wanted capitalism to die
I do
I think I misread what you said
Suuuccccc my zuuccc
fuck you, you half eyed, autistic democratic liberal, and use the right chat, mkay, @The_Rare_LoLi_(not legal)? mkay
hey guys w hats up
not much lol
hbu
**Crapitalism**
w hat
hello>?
what the fuck
what r u a **LIBTARD**
oh shid he found me out
oh no i crabbed my pants
ahw fack
its all smely now
):
fuck you, you half eyed, autistic democratic liberal, and use the right chat, mkay, @Yeller Mang ? mkay
i guess i have to switch my diper now
what
oh shid this is the wrong chat
How do you guys feel about immigration, legal or otherwise?
Do you think it should be what we have now, less, or none at all?
i'm alright with immigration as long as people are coming here legally and are willing to work
Have you considered how they vote or how much welfare they're willing to use? Many of them vote democrat, plus they're going into texas which is a big state for Republicans right now. But with the rate of Democrat voting Mexican immigrants going into Texas, it has been slowly turning blue. If it goes blue it'll be hard for us to win elections. On top of that, immigrants cost us a lot of money, because they use a lot more welfare services than born Americans do. Plus their children and their children's children are more likely to do the same.
I don't think we can cut welfare spending until immigration is scaled back by a lot.
i agree
Plus it's better, I think for us to strengthen our borders, since it really puts America first. That's probably the most important thing to me. We're all Americans, we all love our country, and we should all be willing to put its interests above our own personal desires. But since our nation is made up of our people, we should be willing to help each other out as Americans. What do you think?
Of course we should strengthen our borders, if you don't have a border, you don't have a country
That's the biggest thing that got me into Trump. I got sick of coward politicians selling America out to foreign interests.
also fuck all the globalists that want to take down the borders
build the wall!
I agree completely.
What do you guys think about foreign policy? Specifically, Trump's military action in Syria
Hello
Main reason why a lot of the um Right hated that action was because people believe it was fake
@Deleted User hello btw
That's the biggest thing I was iffy on. Real or not I just don't think we should be attacking foreign countries in the middle of a civil war.
I don't know if thats why people are concerned
I think people are concerned because of Russia, but I don't think they will do shit
Putin just needs to act tough because he's a dick
If they were smart, which I'm assuming they are, they won't retaliate against a super power
brb
I don't think they will, and they haven't. I just think Assad is better than the alternative. He's been taking care of ISIS, plus he's a secular leader who protects Christians. He may be a dictator, but better than a terrorist state imo
k back m8
Cool
So are you a Christian?
yeh u could say that
Alright Ben
Mind if I send you a link to a recruitment server
Sure
Alright
just to ask bois, for the letter N, should I use nationalist or NRA. I'm doing acrostic for Republican btw
can't decide
I say nationalist
Hey guys how do you feel about backing out of the Iran deal?
Mixed
Yeah I'm just trying to get a feel for how everyone feels about it. I feel like their are a lot lies being portrayed
Fuck Iran
It's impossible for any of us to know if the deal was any good.
I'll trust the master dealmaker to make a better deal though
Hopefully its a treaty this time and not a deal. Because the deal Obama proposed wasn't official at all. Obama knew he couldn't get away with a treaty because a treaty requires Congress and House of Representatives. Therefore, there was no official regulations at all
Mhm, exactly.
The great thing is, if liberals hold it up, then all their crying about ripping up the deal backfires on them
@Donaldus Triumphus Wait how is it not official in what way? I thought Obama was within his executive power to sign it. Just like Trump was within his executive power to end it.
Executive orders can be gotten rid of by the next presidemt
Acts of congress need another act of congress to nullify it
You guys hear about what's happening in Nicaragua right now?
Students are getting shot up by the government military forces.
they take fee payment seriously over there
fee payment huh
My lovelies. Weโre going to take over da world.
Silently but deadly
Half of Americans did not vote for either party. Both parties were voted for by a 1/4 of the population individually. We pretend this is a problem when, in actuality, both parties want to maintain this status quo. Having a population politically apathetic makes the bourgeois command of the system easier to maintain.
Trump has a low approval rating and it would be not different under Clinton. Both are Liberal politicians with complete disregard for the population. Have you even heard of the kind of crap Trump's daddy did?
At least China can boast an optimistic future and population with their Socialist market economy, grassroots system (allowing common participation in the runnings of the state), and plan to fully eradicate poverty by 2020 as is the purpose of the current 5 year plan. America can not boast this.
The Communist Party of China does as it says.
The Democratic Party and Republican Party say a lot of crap and do nothing.
80% of Chinese trust their system. 50% of Americans didn't even vote.
Why is this?
The legitimacy of the Chinese Communist Party is dependent on serving the people and guiding the nation to prosperity. Of the falling poverty rates, almost 800 million of that can be attributed to Chinese Socialism. The legitimacy of American parties depend on lobbies and protecting the interests of the rich.
Why and how is Trump any different from any other American politician? Why should I consider him the international representative of the American people when only 1/4 of us even voted him in?
I mean who else is it going to be? Clinton lol
This would apply exactly the same to Clinton.
They are both Liberal politicians.
Rightists.
if its not the president then who would be the international representative of the American people?
the ambassador?
I guess he technically is lol
Our will does not exist if only 1/4 of us said it.
The will of the people does not exist in America.
We have no legitimate international representative.
The hearts and minds of the people are not of the American government or American system.
I dont think 3/4 voted for Clinton
50% didn't vote.
well thats their damn fault lol
they had their chance xd
Most of them were busy working or felt betrayed by the system.
busy working? nah
Betrayed by the system? Perhaps
But they did get a chance to vote for a 3rd party. Maybe if that 50% gained up on Trump and Clinton they actually could have elected a 3rd party
Would a third party be any different.?
depends what you're talking about
The Libertarians are the next biggest ones and they are of the same caliber as the Republicans.
I mean there are left libertarians, not as much tho
Russia's elections happen on a sunday when all work is out and no one is busy.
America's on work days.
yeh but its not DURING work
Yes it is.
wym, its at night
unless if you are a loser that works the nightshift at mcdonalds
If it's at night, that is just as bad.
It is during the day though.
Alabamite.
Depends where you were voting I guess? I know the east coast went first at around like 5
actually more like 6
I'm from Alabama.
so when did you vote m8
I didn't personally vote.
I actually heard you could vote 32 days before the actual election
We live right beside the church where you are supposed to anyway so we are hardly under time contraints.
I mean you dont have to vote on actual election day
you can vote like weeks prior
on the weekend too before election day
This would show that people were refusing to vote consciously.
TBH I think a lot of the people that didn't vote didn't even know you could vote prior
but sure call it that
Mate, people aren't going to vote to preserve the system that gave them their problems anyway even if a new face (party) is in power removing hard fought benefits and aiding the rich.
hard fought benefits, like what
Across the world, hard fought benefits by labor movements are under attack now. Labor is weak and the bourgeois state is screeching in glee. The NHS in Britain for example.
I thought we were talking about the US
I am but it isn't isolated to the US.
The conditions which cause political apathy exist throughout the west.
***oh yeah the west is a piece of shit***
42,736 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 10/171
| Next