i will be more than happy to listen

but for the time being i think this entire things retarded and its not necessary whatsoever

think its cause they got doo doo instead of normal brains

"Get woke and go broke"

^^^^^

That's what the Republican boycotters said to Nikes

i mean

kinda sounds like it works for the repubs as well

ngl

and they did go broke

oh for real?

like how broke we talking

About 4 billion dollars

they lost that much or are at that much

No they lost 4 billion dollars

rip

still pretty stupid

I don't think people need 100 dollar shoes that desperately lol, most of hollywood, actors and celebrity athletes are liberals. NFL got raped by the kneeling, they lost like half their profits

Now they are even cancelling the national anthem at the beginning because on how much viewers they were losing due to the protestors

I'd say it was worth it

...what

you seem like you're going with them just cuz they're repubs

Nah not really, I'm not into sports gear, I could give less of a fuck what other people do with it

>doesnt care about what they even sell

>agrees with repubs

People aren't boycotting because of what they sell, those two things don't contradict at all

i know, but you seem like you dont even care about the topic

yet you're agreeing with the repubs

But the shoes are not the topic

ok

I'd say boycotting Nikes did a tremendous blow, especially to the Democrats

I'm fine with it

>hurts democrats and done by republicans

>ok

k bud

ima go, cya

They can TRY to do the same, they failed both times though

If anything their boycotts reversed it's purpose lol

Remember when the Democrats tried to boycott Chick-Filet and In and Out Burger

***TREMENDOUS FAIL***, all it did was buff the users and influence Republicans to literally line up and buy there

Also SJWs are trying to do the same with the new DOOM GAME, will also most likely fail and just make it even more popular

Definitely was a great investment, and worth burning some crappy shoes

is the reason you don't care about sports shoes is that you're shaped like kirby @Donaldus Triumphus

Nah, btw nintendo is trash

PC Master Race

How to make a server paranoid 101

I’m part of antifa

***P E R M B A N ***

See he’s now paranoid

Nah they can barely do shit, even if there are Antifa members here (which there probably are), what are they gonna do lol

Discord in of itself is a datamining operation ( as that is how they get money, being a free application to install ) so I'm not too worried about gay commie bronies

The discord staff is who "leaks" doxxes to unicorn riot and the like

Only real thing you got to worry about is doxing, and that is if some retard posted private info in a public server

They do record and log every action made it seems

Hello

Hey

I’m not antifa

But I’m not aligned to either party

I’m a swinger

I'm full rightwing

<:Anticommunism:475774022253019156>

#resisst

@Donaldus Triumphus did the Trump twitter bot break? 😢

Oh jesus

noticed its been inactive for quite some time

Ill see what I can do

its not a bot btw, its a webhook

Cool. I do appreciate not having to go to twitter. I hate that place.

Trump is not pleased with that NYT article
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1037485664433070080

Alright guys, I guess its time for me to confess.

I, also, am an insider.

Yep. Tru.

Im a supersecret insider spy.

Noice... Gimme secrets boi

@Donaldus Triumphus

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/184628629/attention-to-everyone-on-pol

Howdy

hiii

<:WhatDid:483590200275107840><:YouDo:483590217090072586><:ToMyDrink:483590241962295307>

😂

Wanna hear a joke?

**REPUBLICANISM**.

Democracy and capitalism brings greed.

While communism takes from the rich and gives to the poor.

Everyone gets the same.

@Shadowstitcher11 uhhh

no

because communism itself then creates an elite system in which a small elite owns pretty much everything

yeah everyone gets the same

**FUCKING POVERTY**

because everyone's money is taken away

see how this works?

>doctors get the same as factory workers

>seems like there is sure encouragment for skilled labor here!

@𝕡𝕦𝕘𝕤𝕪 𝕥𝕙𝕖 ducc Poverty is not because of communism it is because of the countries economy.

There can be wealthy communist nations.

Heil Heer

<:GOP:475779349253980162>

@Chancellor Federalist did you win?

Dropped out due to another situation

You could be looking at the next vp

@Merch

thats awesome man

can you get me unbanned if so lol

I'll see if the SCOUTS will accept a

Writ of Certiorari

@Merch

Ok cool

On your behalf

So what's that supposed raid meant to accomplish

@Kage Why hello there, welcome

Republican Patriot I presume?

@powerlifter Your welcome

Hello

You know if you got any other Republican patriotic friends, invite them

Trying to grow to become a God Emporium Republican Server

Good joke, Shadow 👌

Agreed

@Shadowstitcher11 please then give me an example of a wealthy communist nation. Please do. Btw, china doesn't count because it uses a capitalist economic system all while using a communist social system

see?

the only way a commie nation can remotely gain wealth is by taxing the fuck out of its populations

which only helps them in the short run

Are you high?

(referring to an earlier part of the conversation)

and reduces their population's wealth while barely even doing what it's supposed to do, namely *"redistribute wealth"*

or

turn to a capitalist economic system

like china did

Sir.... "please then give me an example of a wealthy communist nation" is like saying "please give an example of a normal healthy person with progeria, living a life completely unaffected by their condition"

Communism has always failed. They might blame capitalism but you can't un-do inflation and mass murderers, people flee-ing the country and pretty much needing a dictator and armed people at borders, aiming guns one way to even try and keep the system alive.

exactly

yes

I debated this retard

Shadowstitcher

Wot?

and since I can't post screenshots:

Shadowstitcher11Yesterday at 8:41 PM
Wanna hear a joke?
REPUBLICANISM.
Democracy and capitalism brings greed.
While communism takes from the rich and gives to the poor.
Everyone gets the same.

this is what we're up against

dumb. fuck.

How does that person stating facts make them retarded?

I find it hilarious how they claim it brings greed. Greed is inherited, it's evolutionary trait. To what extend - it differs. But it's not like others' people greed is stopping you from becoming wealthy yourself. Infact, becoming richer is easier now than it ever was (fact) and has risen more people out of poverty than ever.

Uhm. Wot?

Which part is confusing

That beginning part. You obviously have now idea what greed is.

intense and selfish desire for something, especially wealth, power, or food.

Do you think selfish and intense desire was not there? It has always been there, it is what has increased the fitness of particular species.

Ok, lets pretend you already knew that. Now think of the contexts of communism and capitalism until you make the connection. Don't type 'til you find the connection if you wanna look really smart.

....What.

mate what?

really?

You really need help with this?

What would it mean in the context of communism? Communism despices greed but that's like ignoring human nature.

exactly

Exactly

So saying capitalism brings greed is wrong. It is there to begin with.

No

***context***

More greed? Sure. But brings greed? No, it was already there.

Communism literally ignores human nature

Excuse me

I literally said ***context***. Do I need to teach you about logic?

You haven't explained anything so I see zero reasoning in your statements.

?

and dont be smuggy with me, not my fault you fail to explain yourself.

I didn't claim to explain anything and I'm not being smug. I literally gave you context and asked you to think

"how they claim it brings greed. Greed is inherited, it's evolutionary trait" Tell me what's wrong here.

Saying CONTEXT will not make it be false

What is wrong here is that you are ignoring context. Out of context that definition is still partially inaccurate. People are inherently greedy, but that doesn't mean people inherit it. It is part of the nature of anything of notable intelligence.

Context is immeasurably significant for determining what a word means. Example; generally saying "sex" would mean the action of reproducing, but given the right context, it is the gender of an animal or person, determined by physical attributes. Or even the act of determining gender.

In the context of the joke by Shadowstitcher11, communism doesn't cause greed for the average working idiot because everybody is equally poor. And capitalism is an extreme catalyst for greed because everyone earns a different amount. It's called extrapolating logic from a perspective. No matter how much of an idiot someone is, it helps to try see their logic so you can better understand them, especially if you plan to have an argument with them.

Lol, bunch of false accusations there. I'm not ignoring the context, what I've said is factually correct and you haven't pointed out what is wrong about my definition (you called me out on saying I have no idea what greed is) , rather you're changing the topic now - without defining what it actually is, you're just using word sementics. And your statement is wrong, communism can also "cause" greed - and it has been proven a lot of times via expending black market in USSR, despite state-control market. You need to know what the premise of the communism aka Karl Marx is - human is the product of the environment, not the genes. But that is false. And saying capitalism is an extreme catalyst for greed because everyone earns a different amount - yeah so what? My statement was that greed is something inherited (and you dodged that), inequality is not necesarily bad, especially in case of free market.

Congratulations, you misread everything making further any debate pointless.

And sex is not the action of reproducing btw, atleast learn how to get it right.

You are horrible via definitions.

I'm using actual examples, you're not using anything but word semantics.

>mocks my semantics and comprehension skills
>says "horrible via definitions"

When talking about the use of a word, semantics is everything. To claim that is not the case is retarded.

Well you have proven you don't know what sex is.

And you have proven you don't know second economy of Soviet Union existed. Which goes towards my point that greed is inherited, rather than solely the cause of environment.

Again long essay inc?

"Well you have proven you don't know what sex is." Ok sir, what is your fictitious definition of sex then?
"And you have proven you don't know second economy of Soviet Union existed." How? I never mentioned one because it was unnecessary. I explained Shadowstitcher11 joke and never stated I agreed with them. I was explaining the logic.

Well, it isn't the act of reproducing, that's one.

So you were wrong there.

Second of all, it is necessary. Because communism does not get rid of greed. Greed is evolutionary trait (like I stated), it is not solely the product of environment (where Karl Marx was wrong) - and this was my argument to begin with.

It is a good example to disprove communism's failed attempt to get rid of greed in practise. In theory, they're wrong by even rejecting human nature.

Are you typing in word then copy pasting? Lmfao.

Just goes to show you're not very confident in your arguments

😴 😴 😴 😴 😴

Typing... stopped typing... typing ... stopped typing.. You're literally the worst debater ever

Excuse me? Remember this: "Congratulations, you misread everything making further any debate pointless." I was using "sex" as an example of how context is important. Not once did I say explicitly that "this is the definition of sex" I said "generally saying "sex" would mean the action of reproducing"
There is this word that comes to mind.... Ah yes, "reading?" That might help you here.
"Second of all, it is necessary." No. Why do I need to give an example for something that is irrelevant to my argument?
"Greed is evolutionary trait (like I stated), it is not solely the product of environment (where Karl Marx was wrong) - and this was my argument to begin with." False. It is both. People are inherently greedy... but their environment can tempt further greed.
"Are you typing in word then copy pasting? Lmfao." No. What makes you think that? Just because I type slower than you? Or the fact that I actually read your messages carefully then proofread my responses before sending?

Yeah you were using sex as an example, but your definition isiquite obviously wrong. Quite ironic that you blamed me for not knowing what greed is, altho I clearly defined it for you. You did not use the word generally, so nice try trying to dodge it now, sex is NOT the act of reproducing so your statement was wrong, simple as that. Second of all, you have shown once again you fail to comprehend things. I never claimed greed is solely the product of genes, infact I only stated it is not SOLELY the product of environment - give me a quote where I stated that? Can't? Obviously, point proven. 😉 Well... It's just funny because something tells me you'd do awful in a vocal debate.

I'm not wrong, I said it is not SOLELY the result of environment. Nice comprehension skills. I'll be waiting on that quote.

"but your definition isiquite obviously wrong" No. You ignored me again, well done. As I clearly said, I was explaining use not explicit and context-less definitions.
"You did not use the word generally, so nice try trying to dodge it now, sex is NOT the act of reproducing so your statement was wrong, simple as that. Second of all, you have shown once again you fail to comprehend things." If you actually read what I said without the intent of trying to start a fight, but actually to understand the other perspective of the other person or to just share your own logic (the difference between a civil debate and a pointless argument) then you wouldn't have come to that laughably incorrect conclusion about what I said.
"I never claimed greed is solely the product of genes, infact I only stated it is not SOLELY the product of environment - give me a quote where I stated that? Can't? Obviously, point proven. 😉" I didn't say that you made that claim your wording implied it. Your explanation is actually contradictory... "Greed is evolutionary trait (like I stated)" can stand alone to imply that it is purely inherent and you said "it is not solely the product of environment (where Karl Marx was wrong)" which does not state that nurture and nature are mutually exclusive in this argument but nor does it make them inclusive..
"Well... It's just funny because something tells me you'd do awful in a vocal debate." Irrelevant but correct. I have difficulty talking and speak haltingly often. Possibly a combination of a head injury and social reclusivity.

I didn't ignore you, fact of the matter is - you said sex is act of reproduction - which is not. Doesn't matter what the use behind it was.

If you are not willing to read my arguments properly and just insult me and make baseless assumptions then I am not willing to debate you because neither of us will gain anything from it. Cheers

Second of all, yes you did fail to comprehend things because you said my statement was wrong. Which wasn't - unless you can point what was wrong about me saying "Greed is evolutionary trait (like I stated), it is not solely the product of environment (where Karl Marx was wrong) - and this was my argument to begin with." Your reasoning was that it is both - which I never claimed it wasn't. Just goes to show you lack comprehension issues and you were caught off-guard.

Nurture and nature aren't mutually exclusive? Please explain this, because I'd like to expose your lack of understanding once again.

Btw, you were the first one to insult me. Just saying.

I'd engage properly if you did

Anyways sorry if I offended you, cheers

This is the last I will say in this argument:
"you said sex is act of reproduction" nope. Never. I explained how in general use without context, that is what the word refers to.
"Nurture and nature aren't mutually exclusive" you left off "in this argument" quoting tiny phrases out of context can make them seem like stupidity often. I did not give this clause without context for a reason, it was meant to go together to give it the intended meaning. This is what I mean when I call you out for sad comprehension skills. It is not me insulting you, it is me stating what the situation looks like. In that same way that referring to mentally deficient people as retards is not inaccurate nor is it an insult, it's just insensitive at best.
"because I'd like to expose your lack of understanding once again" another reason why this argument is hilariously pointless. No reason to debate if all you want is to highlight another person's flaws.
"Btw, you were the first one to insult me. Just saying." I did not say anything with the intent of insulting you, if you saw it that way that was purely by your own interpretation.
I engaged properly, it was not productive, I shall now withdraw.
You did not offend me, just frustrated me.

Lmao, I only asked you to explain that - who cares if I left off the quote - you can explain it in which you didn't. You started crying about how I didn't use the whole quote - who gives a shit when I'm asking for explanation and not calling you out on it being false? But clearly you already know my intentions. Disgenious. Oh and btw, from you: ""sex" would mean the action of reproducing" - False but whatever.

Just going in circles now, not back-tracking on my true statements anyways

I know I said that I wouldn't continue but what the hell?. Seriously? ***I just told you about quoting out of context and you go and do it again***.

Retard, it's not out of context - I literally quoted what YOU said. I told you to FURTHERMORE EXPLAIN IT. It is NOT out of context when I'm giving you teh chance to EXPLAIN what I just quoted, I haven't strawmanned you once. What an autist lmao

"Retard, it's not out of context - I literally quoted what YOU said" You don't know what "quoted out of context" means then. When someone is quoted out of context it means that either the quote was shortened to change it's meaning (what has happened here) or the situation around which the quote happened is ignored, like if I said I don't like darker girls when someone asked about romantic preferences and you tell it to someone without giving the context of romance.
I have explained enough. Your refusal to leave it alone and ignore me is beyond frustrating... Now goodbye.

What difference does it make, autist? I was asking for further explanation - it does not mean my attention was to strawman you or change the context of what you're saying. And once again, your example is shit - I'm not telling anyone what you meant here or presenting your case in a different manner - I'm just asking for furhter explanation. You're actually autistic and lack comprehension skills.

╚═( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)═╝
╚═(███)═╝ This is Lennypede. Help
╚═(███)═╝ Lennypede take over
╚═(███)═╝ discord by pasting him
╚═(███)═╝ in 10 other servers
╚═(███)═╝or he will never
╚═(███)═╝ be a meme.
╚═(███)═╝
╚═(███)═╝
╚═(███)═╝
╚═(███)═╝
╚═(███)═╝
╚═(███)═╝
╚═(███)═╝
╚(███)╝
╚(██)╝

@Loltyler1 Oh God please no

@Hammerheart Why is your name "Hammerheart"

It is an album by bathory, their best in my opinion

My favorite is Blood Fire Death

Yeah that one is good too

I especially like the title track

What other bands do you like

sorry for the delay. Now I mostly listen to classic rock and country, but for metal I like megadeth, Iron Maiden, Burzum, and a few others

@FriarPop Did a raid happen or something? Seemed to be very low energy

yea, it was about 5 russians

or what seemed to be, they all started spamming nonsense, fixed it in no time lol.

they tried and failed, very low energy lol

what were there names

That was a waste of time. You should have stopped at you don’t understand what sex is? To take it any further was dumb! If your spending your time debating the different reasons people have sex your an idiot.

the fuck are you talking aboit

Write a fucking book and move on there are more important things in life

What

Are you high or are you actually referring to something in specific that we don't know of.

@Fuzzy Balls Wrong server? lol

one of the names i remember was Gregor or something like that

but its really not important is it?

Maybe but it seems like a waste of intelligence to me nothing better to banter about? Your literally arguing about how you were perceived by someone and then trying to make them understand where your coming from. Seems silly to me.

... wat

Never mind

If you're talking to someone in particular, tagging them would help clear up some confusion.

@An Elbow was word gaming “context” but it just kept going it was funny at first but at some point you should realize when your being fucked with. That’s all I was saying.

Makes more sense now. lol

How many times can “context” be said before you catch on?

Stop taking me out of context

You don’t know what sex is. Sex:the act of reproduction- really? R u Webster? Sorry I’ll stop

hey sorry this is off topic but has anyone experienced ppl stalking them? unfortunately I've found myself in a position where some really extreme ideologue type person is sending me tons of stuff via private social media. Through ignoring it it's gotten worse and I'm scared they are going to keep escalating

@fractalvirus Through discord or what

lol this is embarrassing but it actually began on a site called neopets which I use and now it's just...escalated

escalated you say

what do you mean by, escalated

taking it from just arguing on the website to finding my facebook and constantly sending me shit from new accounts threatening to dox me etc

I mean luckily there's really no info on my facebook but idk I'm just worried I've never experienced something like this before

I wouldn't worry about it, they antifa?

or communists

communist 100% idk if they are part of antifa although I mean they really act like it

yeah you're right I shouldn't worry I mean it's their entire intent to make me nervous so

it's just scary to me lol

They're are only a couple communist noodle-armed millenial scumbags, you got nothing to fear

Just block them and be done with, or send em a shit ton of pro trump memes

God Emperor Trump of Mankind memes to be exact