tradworker

Discord ID: 420338445823508480


6,032 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev | Page 20/25 | Next

2018-03-08 17:17:15 UTC

A nation has to decide what type of nation it will be

2018-03-08 17:17:22 UTC

either it will be a Christian 1

2018-03-08 17:17:24 UTC

a Moslem 1

2018-03-08 17:17:31 UTC

Hindu 1

2018-03-08 17:17:37 UTC

or a Buddhist 1

2018-03-08 17:17:55 UTC

If you attempt to legalize all faith in your nation, it will eventually destroy it

2018-03-08 17:18:07 UTC

while I personally have no problem with brothers who practice Odinism

2018-03-08 17:18:38 UTC

we have to have basic understandings about morality and social structure to make cooperation possible

2018-03-08 17:25:30 UTC

Itโ€™s officially spring break! THOUSAND YEAR REICH WHEN???

2018-03-08 17:26:03 UTC

Wasn't the actual letter of the Naturalization Act of 1790 and every act afterwards until the 1920s with the exception of freed nighers in 1870 and the children of illegal Chinese "White Europeans of good standing"? Also weren't muds turned away at Ellis Island?

2018-03-08 17:26:37 UTC

DECLARATION OF A NEW ORDER

2018-03-08 17:26:42 UTC

I remember even Lovecraft wrote about muds being turned away

2018-03-08 17:26:57 UTC

THE WEIMAR REPUBLIC WILL BE REORGANIZED INTO THE THIRD GERMAN REICH

2018-03-08 17:27:06 UTC

FOR A SAFE AND SECURE SOCIETY

2018-03-08 17:27:14 UTC

but seriously happy spring break guys

2018-03-08 17:27:16 UTC

I miss /our_guy/ authors like lovecraft

2018-03-08 17:27:18 UTC

me too

2018-03-08 17:27:27 UTC

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/420338445823508480/421358301201170444/1484845212314.png

2018-03-08 17:29:38 UTC

He probably shouldn't have fallen for the Khazar milkers meme though

2018-03-08 17:30:48 UTC

I asked Alex Terrible from Slaughter to Prevail if heโ€™d do a song about gassing kikes

2018-03-08 17:30:52 UTC

He said no...

2018-03-08 17:31:06 UTC

F

2018-03-08 17:33:22 UTC

Slaughter to prevail is core shit if I remember so probably not

2018-03-08 17:35:19 UTC

@Wraff The only ones who would have been turned away were maybe from the Indian Subcontinent or Africa. HOWEVER Plenty of Negroes from the West Indies entered the USA

2018-03-08 17:36:56 UTC

No it was never White Europeans it just said FREE WHITE

2018-03-08 17:37:07 UTC

Jews and Gypsies residing in Europe were allowed to Immigrate

2018-03-08 17:37:51 UTC

Even European Muslims from Albania and the Balkans began coming in in the 1870s and successfully sued to stay in the Country on the basis of being White

2018-03-08 17:38:28 UTC

The Term WHITE was never adequately defined. After the Treaty of Guadelupe Hildalgo in 1848 WHITE was extended to ALL MEXICANS

2018-03-08 17:38:56 UTC

this is really sad to learn...

2018-03-08 17:39:01 UTC

but im glad you're sharing

2018-03-08 17:39:02 UTC

later it was extended to all of Latin America which is why to this day look up a crime report, you will see alot of Garcia's and Ramirez's under the term White

2018-03-08 17:39:42 UTC

Well Der Jager it pissed me off when I learned it too and when I also learned how the Kikes after Thomas Jefferson's 1802 Open Borders law made it almost impssible to deport anyone

2018-03-08 17:39:47 UTC

that was irritating as well

2018-03-08 17:40:28 UTC

In 1848 when thousands of German Leftists and German Jewish Leftists fled reprisals and came to America, President Polk a Southerner was Preisdent, we had just finished the Mexican War

2018-03-08 17:40:51 UTC

as there was no Immigration Authorities in 1848 nor any way to deport them, all they had to do was exit the ship and they were here

2018-03-08 17:41:34 UTC

Polk being a Democrat made no effort to attempt to stop it. Fact is without this 1848 Immigration, its likely Lincoln would never have been elected in 1860

2018-03-08 17:41:39 UTC

Immigration has consequences

2018-03-08 17:42:14 UTC

Thomas Jefferson gave us Open Borders in 1802, a corrupt agreement between Southern Democrats and Northern business interests headquarterd in New York City

2018-03-08 17:42:37 UTC

More immigrants=more cheap labor=more Democrats=support for Slavery

2018-03-08 17:42:51 UTC

thats what they believed, but it bit them in the ass by the 1850s

2018-03-08 17:43:52 UTC

Alexander Hamilton, John Adams and the Federalists wanted restricted Immigration, but Jefferson knew if Immigration was restricted, the Democrats wouldn't win the Presidency

2018-03-08 17:44:42 UTC

its awesome to know this history...I never questioned that America was founded as a Christian nation for whites

2018-03-08 17:44:45 UTC

What they didnt anticipate was a bunch of Statists and Leftists from Germany coming and becoming Anti-Democrats

2018-03-08 17:44:56 UTC

until a few years ago, I realized the christian part was bullshit

2018-03-08 17:44:59 UTC

the Democrats believed all Immigrtion was good

2018-03-08 17:45:34 UTC

Thats why the KNOW NOTHING Party was founded, they were the first group that demanded to close and police the borders

2018-03-08 17:45:35 UTC

seems they thought it was good/not in the way they view it now specifically as a way to replace whites

2018-03-08 17:45:42 UTC

but its still about cheap labor

2018-03-08 17:46:01 UTC

No it was always about cheap labor. The racial replacement is a Jewish angle, and a side benefit

2018-03-08 17:46:19 UTC

cheap labor and get rid of the whites

2018-03-08 17:46:21 UTC

win/win

2018-03-08 17:46:21 UTC

still most of the Republicans still think its cheap labor and have no idea about the racial replacement angle

2018-03-08 17:46:37 UTC

bill did nothing wrong

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/420338445823508480/421363124965474305/a19.png

2018-03-08 17:46:38 UTC

and if you tell a Republican about the racial replacement program

2018-03-08 17:46:42 UTC

they call you a racist

2018-03-08 17:46:45 UTC

now its kinda hard to avoid the racial aspect...they literally come out and say it!

2018-03-08 17:46:54 UTC

that video by dillon at teh SPLC conf

2018-03-08 17:47:01 UTC

Well theyve gotten brave and I am so glad they say

2018-03-08 17:47:05 UTC

we want all Whites dead

2018-03-08 17:47:13 UTC

because guess what, that gives us ammo

2018-03-08 17:48:02 UTC

The thing is when we play those clips and/or send them to Tucker Carlson or someone like that, they attempt to deny it

2018-03-08 17:48:13 UTC

saying its just hyperbole it doesnt REALLY mean kill White People

2018-03-08 17:48:33 UTC

BILL THE BUTCHER WAS A WISE MAN

2018-03-08 17:48:50 UTC

He knew that it was Irish today and then something else tomorrow, the mudslide would never stop

2018-03-08 17:49:05 UTC

Think about this.

2018-03-08 17:49:32 UTC

in 1830 the Lower East Side of Manhattan was a Black Ghetto, with a sizeable poor white criminal population

2018-03-08 17:49:49 UTC

by 1850 it was almost all Irish with a large Jewish population moving in

2018-03-08 17:49:54 UTC

from Germany

2018-03-08 17:50:10 UTC

by 1890 it was almost entirely Jewish and Italian

2018-03-08 17:51:02 UTC

Bill The Butcher was a member of the Know Nothing Party, that part in the movie Gangs of New York where he dressed in the large stovepipe hats

2018-03-08 17:51:17 UTC

that identified them as Know Nothings 100% Americanism

2018-03-08 17:54:52 UTC

In 1830 Baltimore Maryland was a Southern Port Town but between 1830 and 1860 so many Irish, Jews, and Germans moved in that the Know Nothings won the governorship in Maryland

2018-03-08 17:55:12 UTC

this was how the North was able to occupy Maryland, they had hordes of Immigrants to do it

2018-03-08 17:56:39 UTC

Something was largely keeping non-whites out until 1965 though

2018-03-08 17:57:04 UTC

The demographics remained a constant 90% until then

2018-03-08 17:57:27 UTC

Actually in 1790 the United States was only about 75% white

2018-03-08 17:57:41 UTC

the White Population increased because of open Immigration

2018-03-08 17:57:47 UTC

and that was a side benefit

2018-03-08 17:57:57 UTC

THE DOWNSIDE WAS THAT IT CULTURALLY SHIFTED THE COUNTRY

2018-03-08 17:58:14 UTC

probably one of the big factors keeping white majority despite open immigration was that the ability to travel to the US From outside CONUS was difficult

2018-03-08 17:58:17 UTC

in fact the White population in the USA if you look at family size was never growing naturally

2018-03-08 17:58:18 UTC

no planes

2018-03-08 17:58:28 UTC

at the rate England was

2018-03-08 17:58:57 UTC

Probably should have sent all the niggers back then when we had the chance

2018-03-08 17:59:00 UTC

In 1800 believe it or not, the average Englishman had 8 kids

2018-03-08 17:59:08 UTC

the average American had 5

2018-03-08 17:59:23 UTC

slavery was a mistake 100%

2018-03-08 17:59:35 UTC

the niggers should have never been imported here

2018-03-08 17:59:36 UTC

for some reason fertility in the United States was not as high as in England

2018-03-08 17:59:45 UTC

but our infant mortality was lower

2018-03-08 17:59:50 UTC

its very strange

2018-03-08 17:59:54 UTC

hmmm

2018-03-08 18:00:07 UTC

I looked at the numbers

2018-03-08 18:00:09 UTC

5 kids per family is still a high growth rate eveb with that life expectancy

2018-03-08 18:00:23 UTC

thats big fam for now...but maybe avg for that time period?

2018-03-08 18:00:41 UTC

we only approached 90% White really in the 1880s with the immigraiton surge but if you look at Native Born Protestant White Americans

2018-03-08 18:00:47 UTC

Also colonists might not feel as secure with a larger family

2018-03-08 18:00:48 UTC

their growth was flat, EXCEPT FOR THE SOUTH

2018-03-08 18:00:49 UTC

And infant mortality was probably lower because the UK was in a state of famine for most of that century

2018-03-08 18:01:04 UTC

For instance and heres a wierd one

2018-03-08 18:01:15 UTC

The South recovered from the Civil War much better than the North

2018-03-08 18:01:20 UTC

from a demographic standpoint

2018-03-08 18:01:41 UTC

This was because Southern women loved having kids and loved sex

2018-03-08 18:01:50 UTC

they are just hornier in the South

2018-03-08 18:01:53 UTC

its just that way

2018-03-08 18:01:57 UTC

its the heat me thinks

2018-03-08 18:02:10 UTC

Also a much more traditonal anglo culture

2018-03-08 18:02:23 UTC

Or a natural reaction to a better environment

2018-03-08 18:02:33 UTC

In the North following the war, especially in New England, the women responded to the war by simply becoming spinsters

2018-03-08 18:02:42 UTC

Cleaner, better farmland, prettier

2018-03-08 18:02:42 UTC

thus the traditional Yankee population declined

2018-03-08 18:03:00 UTC

and was largely replaced by Irish Catholics, French Canadian Catholics and others

2018-03-08 18:03:13 UTC

Yeah not many WASPs left

2018-03-08 18:03:33 UTC

Yankee Population growth had been declining since the early 1800's when many farm families sent their daughters to work in factories instead of getting married

2018-03-08 18:04:07 UTC

Oh and feminism started growing in the north

2018-03-08 18:04:38 UTC

Jewish influence you mean

2018-03-08 18:04:52 UTC

There was a famous panting featuring New England factory girls

2018-03-08 18:05:06 UTC

Jewish Influence was much higher in the South than in the North BEFORE the 1870s

2018-03-08 18:05:09 UTC

believe it or not

2018-03-08 18:05:18 UTC

but the Southern jews were largely commerical at the time

2018-03-08 18:05:29 UTC

there were few Jews in the North before the 1850s

2018-03-08 18:05:49 UTC

Good read

2018-03-08 18:05:55 UTC

Yeah it was

2018-03-08 18:05:56 UTC

Feminism began coming to the USA as a result of Thomas Jefferson's open immigration

2018-03-08 18:06:00 UTC

Spencer is coming through for us

2018-03-08 18:06:05 UTC

allowing in alot of French Refugees

2018-03-08 18:06:11 UTC

and from England

2018-03-08 18:06:20 UTC

Jews is the south were planters. In the north they were lawyers and bankers. They had wormed their waybinto power in both places

2018-03-08 18:06:42 UTC

There were almost zero Jew bankers and lawyers in the North till the 1870s

2018-03-08 18:06:50 UTC

there were some finaicers

2018-03-08 18:06:55 UTC

but not at every level of power

2018-03-08 18:07:02 UTC

Lincoln's mentor was a Jewish lawyer

2018-03-08 18:07:05 UTC

It was a completely different thing

2018-03-08 18:07:20 UTC

Most Jews in the north had legal power thwn

2018-03-08 18:08:01 UTC

There weren't hundreds of thousands of them like there are today, but they were there and they were upper class

2018-03-08 18:08:01 UTC

There were no elected Jews in the North, there were Jewish senators in the South

2018-03-08 18:08:16 UTC

Judah P Benjamin and David Yulee represented Louisiana and Florida

2018-03-08 18:08:19 UTC

in the 1840s

2018-03-08 18:08:31 UTC

Jews don't need to be elected to have power and influence

2018-03-08 18:08:33 UTC

The Jewish Power in the North largely came in the 1870s

2018-03-08 18:08:35 UTC

1870s

2018-03-08 18:09:33 UTC

Before 1870 most of the Jews in the North were cheap curio junk shop owners, scrap sellers and hustlers

2018-03-08 18:09:45 UTC

the ones from Germany were broke for the most part when they got here, some had money

2018-03-08 18:10:10 UTC

Well at the time it was "modernism"

2018-03-08 18:10:12 UTC

After the Civil War though they invested heavily in Reconstruction

2018-03-08 18:10:32 UTC

That's just false dude

2018-03-08 18:10:38 UTC

The Jews murdered Lincoln so they could control Reconstruction more directly and plus it gave them a martyr

2018-03-08 18:10:43 UTC

whats false Wraff

2018-03-08 18:10:53 UTC

There were plenty of powerful kikes before 1870 in the north

2018-03-08 18:10:57 UTC

The Jewish Power in the North came largely after the Civil War

2018-03-08 18:11:06 UTC

the Jewish Power before 1860 was in the South

2018-03-08 18:11:10 UTC

Baltimore and New Orleans

2018-03-08 18:11:21 UTC

Look up Lincoln's buddies. Tons of kikes in New York academia and law

2018-03-08 18:12:21 UTC

I am aware of some of them but the Jews at the beginning of the war tended to Support the South

2018-03-08 18:12:30 UTC

because of their investments

2018-03-08 18:12:36 UTC

they switched when it went against them

2018-03-08 18:12:39 UTC

to cover their asses

2018-03-08 18:12:49 UTC

Id like to know which Jews of which u are speaking of

2018-03-08 18:13:02 UTC

The Jonas family for one

2018-03-08 18:13:23 UTC

Abraham Lincoln was really close with them and they were pretty prominent

2018-03-08 18:14:54 UTC

Still none of them had the influence or hold on Power Judah P Benjamin did in the Confederacy

2018-03-08 18:15:06 UTC

he ran the CSA into the ground then skedaddled with the cash

2018-03-08 18:15:24 UTC

I still firmly believe Benjamin sabotaged the South to make Rothschild some cash

2018-03-08 18:15:25 UTC

I'll concede that

2018-03-08 18:15:35 UTC

They had Lincoln's ear though

2018-03-08 18:15:41 UTC

Did you know Stonewall Jackson hated Benjamin

2018-03-08 18:15:49 UTC

and heavily influenced his policy

2018-03-08 18:16:03 UTC

well im not sure at which policy u can trace directly to the Kikes

2018-03-08 18:16:22 UTC

Allowing rabbi chaplains

2018-03-08 18:16:24 UTC

Most of these so-called ABoltionists tended to be so-called Fundamentalist Christians

2018-03-08 18:16:52 UTC

which goes to show so-called Fundamentalist Christianity is worthless

2018-03-08 18:17:39 UTC

Also the emancipation proclamation had a certain Issachara Zacharie advisingnit

2018-03-08 18:17:43 UTC

The Confederates if memory served me also made concessions for their Jews as well

2018-03-08 18:17:52 UTC

Yes they did

2018-03-08 18:18:07 UTC

Did you know about the Christian Loyalty Oath

2018-03-08 18:18:12 UTC

the Kikes defeated

2018-03-08 18:18:17 UTC

in the Confederate Congress

2018-03-08 18:18:26 UTC

My point is not to say the CSA was npt kikes

2018-03-08 18:18:41 UTC

Oh no both sides were definately Kikes

2018-03-08 18:18:44 UTC

My point idls to just say the USA was too

2018-03-08 18:18:47 UTC

just in deifferent ways

2018-03-08 18:19:00 UTC

Jews affected one indirectly the other directly

2018-03-08 18:19:04 UTC

and for different reasons

2018-03-08 18:19:11 UTC

Rothschild makes war many different ways

2018-03-08 18:19:14 UTC

One elected Jews and the other elected people with Jewish advisors

2018-03-08 18:19:28 UTC

Just like the Catholic Gazette recorded in Feb 1936

2018-03-08 18:19:32 UTC

You still get kikery either way

2018-03-08 18:19:35 UTC

WE ARE THE FATHERS OF REVOLUTION

2018-03-08 18:19:48 UTC

EVEN THOSE REVOLUTIONS THAT TURN AGAINST US

2018-03-08 18:19:59 UTC

That was from a speech at the Paris Bnai Brith Convention

2018-03-08 18:20:06 UTC

Yeah that sounds Jewy

2018-03-08 18:20:38 UTC

The best irony of that period is that John Wilkes Booth himself was of Jewish ancestry

2018-03-08 18:20:45 UTC

which is the icing on the cake

2018-03-08 18:21:05 UTC

the family name was originally Botha, they were Spanish money changers who had fled Spain via Portugal to England

2018-03-08 18:21:15 UTC

in the late 1600s

2018-03-08 18:23:05 UTC

Martyrdom can cover a multitude of sins

2018-03-08 18:23:18 UTC

the Jews use Martyrs in this way, its a very important tactic

2018-03-08 18:24:43 UTC

JFK couldn't push through all the Jews Civil RIghts and Open Immigration BS, but Lyndon Johnson who was Southron could FORCE the Southern Legislators to go along with it, it was a win-win

2018-03-08 18:25:53 UTC

Killing Bobby Kennedy and MLK was also important as it allowed the Jews to take direct control of the conversation, plus the fact of JFK's opposing Nuclear israel

2018-03-08 18:26:07 UTC

though they supported Israel

2018-03-08 18:28:18 UTC

The Jews murdered George Lincoln Rockwell for another reason. They couldn't allow an IVY-LEAGUE EDUCATED WWII Veteran who could speak on their level oppose them with facts

2018-03-08 18:28:52 UTC

It is more important for Jewry to wrest power in Courts and Committes than in leaders

2018-03-08 18:31:08 UTC

What was the role of Rothschild in WW2?

2018-03-08 18:31:34 UTC

The Rothschilds were largely with the Allies, although they still did maintain some Axis investments through back channels

2018-03-08 18:31:39 UTC

they got paid either way

2018-03-08 18:32:14 UTC

For some reason Adofl HItler didnt confiscate and nationalize the banks as he should have done immediately in fact he let them operate for some time afrer seizing power

2018-03-08 18:33:01 UTC

Ernst Rohm wanted immediate confiscation of all private property

2018-03-08 18:33:05 UTC

Hitler refused to do it

2018-03-08 18:33:21 UTC

while Hitler was right in the SHORT TERM, Rohm was definately right in the LONG TERM

2018-03-08 18:33:47 UTC

For some reason I thought they were connected in some way with the rise of the Nazi party

2018-03-08 18:33:57 UTC

Donโ€™t recall where I heard that

2018-03-08 18:33:57 UTC

Hitler was afraid the German Army would manage to overhtrow the Nazis

2018-03-08 18:34:13 UTC

and he didnt want to antagonize them until he had solidified his support with them

2018-03-08 18:34:26 UTC

Had Rohm had his way, every Banker would have been shot

2018-03-08 18:34:42 UTC

which was in retrosepct the right way

2018-03-08 18:35:05 UTC

So yeah I was reading about how Hitler nationalized some industry

2018-03-08 18:35:18 UTC

Rohm was more Communistic, Hitler was more Controlled Capitalism

2018-03-08 18:35:19 UTC

But let other companies stay private owned

2018-03-08 18:35:35 UTC

Hitler didnt even nationalize most of the German Economy till 1944

2018-03-08 18:35:43 UTC

he should have done it earlier, but he didnt

2018-03-08 18:35:48 UTC

Thereโ€™s downsides to each approach

2018-03-08 18:36:08 UTC

Itโ€™s amazing in hindsight

2018-03-08 18:36:18 UTC

I will ask a question from American History

2018-03-08 18:36:46 UTC

Why do you think it benefitted the Kikes more to Kill Lincoln following the Civil War?

2018-03-08 18:36:47 UTC

To see that the Germans could have indeed won the war if not for the main issue

2018-03-08 18:36:50 UTC

its very simple

2018-03-08 18:36:54 UTC

Ok hmm ๐Ÿค”

2018-03-08 18:37:12 UTC

You have to prevent lawsuits against land confiscation and if the defendent is dead

2018-03-08 18:37:19 UTC

there can be no case, that is one

2018-03-08 18:37:55 UTC

another is if the abuse of power works its way through a working court system alot of nasty things get exposed and you risk impeachment trials and all sorts of madness financial isntability

2018-03-08 18:38:25 UTC

another one is if you kill the leader, you can rest all control in the hands of the legislature and the courts

2018-03-08 18:38:49 UTC

Like in Ancient Rome the Dictator would only serve during the emergency then he was to return power to the Senate

2018-03-08 18:39:12 UTC

Ah ok that makes perfect sense

2018-03-08 18:39:15 UTC

Another one is the idea of Martyrdom

2018-03-08 18:39:19 UTC

Do you have a degree in history lol

2018-03-08 18:39:24 UTC

Cause you know alot

2018-03-08 18:39:28 UTC

You can take an illegal war, cover it in Martyrdom and make it look good

2018-03-08 18:39:37 UTC

then you can create a pantheon of heroes

2018-03-08 18:39:45 UTC

and manipulate the narrative

2018-03-08 18:39:49 UTC

no i dont have a degree

2018-03-08 18:40:09 UTC

See i studied it for years trying to understand the American Civil War.

2018-03-08 18:40:31 UTC

Why would you kill a President when there is absolutely no way it can help your side achieve victory?

2018-03-08 18:40:51 UTC

The answer has to be yes it was to provide a victory of another kind

2018-03-08 18:40:56 UTC

NAMELY SCHLOMOS VICTORY

2018-03-08 18:41:39 UTC

When the answer is unclear

2018-03-08 18:41:41 UTC

Name the Jew

2018-03-08 18:41:44 UTC

it always works

2018-03-08 18:42:33 UTC

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/420338445823508480/421377200240197633/hell_yeah.png

6,032 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev | Page 20/25 | Next