deep-discussion
Discord ID: 449299808793001984
1,267 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/13
| Next
Why are you so aggressive
Thats stupid.
You're needlessly antagonistic toward me
I am a angry nazi๐
Why shitpost memes in **deep-discussion**? :<:rockwell_think:449213130472423444>
And it is hot. So be kind now. ๐
I'm very kind
What's the topic? Sorry I am burger I don't speak Swedish
hรคr รคr hans riktiga twitter konto
alla andra han stรคngts ner
https://yout
*Third Reich: Return of the Holy Roman Empire*
http://jettandjahn.afrasaibi.com/books/ThirdReichPDF.pdf
Must watch:
https://youtu.be/uP1XOeW2g0Y
How hopeful is NRM about the Swedish elections? Any idea if you'll get any seats?
@Deleted User We are not naive so we don't expect "success" in relation to the mainstream parties, but it is a good tool to gain access to political arenas we are not otherwise able to spread our views in.
It also legitimizes us and is a good way to estimate popular support, but I personally doubt it is above 0,5 - 1% amongst the voting population. Then again, a lot of people I meet at school and workplaces claim they support us a lot when they find out I'm a member.
Personally I expect around 5000 votes in the country, hopefully municipal seat in Ludvika. Ideal would be to get seats in all the municipalities where we are participating in local elections, which means getting seats in Ludvika, Kungรคlv and Boden.
Securing some small towns is good
I think the most important thing is that people understand that NMR dosent go to elections to outright win but to show that we are a alternative. Worst thing someone could do would be to become blackpilled if we gain nothing
Defeatism is gay.
lol @Deleted User if NRM was electable they woudnt need to run
>elections
Waste of resources for no gain
ikr
Hello, how's everything people?
Voting, truly, today can only work in small communities
like village municipalities or shit like that
@ะะตัะตะปะธะฝะฐโฆ eh, it only seems reliable in small communities where there is no clearly established decision-makers who can be trusted to do what is best
Alexander Slavros talked about it extensively, voting on a national scale makes no sense since you dont know the people you are voting for
so in the end it comes down to choosing the best liar
โ
Socrates talked about that when he talked about his views on elitism. People tend to vote for the "sweets sellers" rather than the "doctors", since no one wants to hear the painful truth the doctor gives you.
unless an actual NS state is established I woudnt mind having a democracy like that of Switzerland, ofc it will only work if the population is racially homogenous, able to make rational decisions and of course if only adult men can vote
National Socialist Germany was a true democracy.
I'm inclined to believe democracy is impossible no matter how you organize it. Socrates was for what I understood a proponent of democracy just because he saw it as an inherent Athenian value. The democracy of the Athenians was way different than the parlamentarianism we know as "democracy" today.
@Thule it was a dictatorship my man
Sure, but he listened to his folk.
The greek meaning of the word democracy is good to keep in mind. Means "the people decide". What NS means in this context is imo "the Will of the volk". A big difference.
that doesn't mean it's a democracy at all then @Thule
@Hunter491 It's not just that you don't know them, it's also that there are clearly established dominant and merited key people around, its better if they naturally take the power they are suited for. In a very small community maybe it makes sense, since people might be nearly equally uneducated on how to run their community, so they need to base it on "Most people feel this way, so it's probably the least stupid choice"
NS Germany is gone, We should try to look for better models of governance lol
which would suit modern times
The Will of the Germans (and Aryans) met it's zenith in Hitler. He spoke the voice of all and acted with the Will of all.
Hitler manifested Germany so he was best suited to lead it
There are no better "models of governance" than the Hitlerian. Policies are arbitrary when it comes to empire building.
If a leader doesn't manifest the character and virtues of what he leads, he is not a true leader
In the end such a leader needs to rise naturally, not be elected after shelling out money on an electoral campaign and asking people to vote for him, it's just absurd
In this case even the elections in Germany that enabled Hitler were not mere elections, I mean you had open warfare in the streets between Hitlerists and opponents of all kinds
it was a battleground of force and action not a popularity contest of money and fikabrรถd
at any rate there will be no such person
Im still waiting for Turner Diares to happen lol
Why do you say that? How do you know.
assuming we are talking about Europe
such person would be quickly assinated, bought off, blackmailed, his group would be infiltrated and exposes
leaderless resistance is what we need
The Aryan blood demands a Hero to be born. It is the prerequisite of it.
It is wyrd. Inevitable fate
I dont believe in this esotericism sorry
Doesn't matter if you believe it or not. Just look at Hitler.
I dont see him as this near godlike mythical person either
sorry
it's not esotericism even if he used an esoteric term
well even the term is just mythological, not esoteric
it's been acknowledged by countless men from antiquity to Hitler's own statements that history is changed by the hands of a few great personalities, not by the masses
oh I dont dispute that
Yup. There is a difference between just saying "nope" and actually thinking about it
all Im saying is that one person wont save Europe
he may save his own country
if it comes to that
But then you're denying what you don't dispute
im not denying anything, i just dont believe in fate therefore I dont think that some great person is predistined to show up
Clearly one man won't save Europe, but one man will ignite the fire and be responsible.
One person never saved "Europe". It was the Will of the volk that put those banners up and fired those rifles
It is way more complicated than just a historical accurance between the years of 1890 and 1947
The problem of a unified people at this moment is that there tends to be different organizations with the same goal with similar ideals of getting to it. They need to be unified however the problem is that we are not unified at the moment and that's what the Jew wants. Keep continuing it and our downfall is inevitable.
I like the NRM, I really do. They are one of the few, what the mainstream media calls, "Neo-Nazi" movements which I admire
Authentic people who want to keep a Nazi racialist state in all of Scandinavia and the Nordic countries. (If you have a problem with me using the term Nazi, please talk to me in DMs)
One man cannot save Europe. That has been tried by Hitler. God bless his soul. Anywho, yes,
However it is the will of the people that must rise up, of course with a leader, a Fรผhrer/Duce/Conducator, etc that shall lead you to it
Hitler has predicted that a 100 years later, a new leader shall come to help us through our struggle. I predict somewhere in 2033-34 someone like Hitler will show up and save Europe from its current niggerization and Jewry.
Are you referring to "the Man to Come"?
1,267 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/13
| Next